Observations from Day 1 of the Easley Hearings
It was fascinating watchin the State Board of Electionshearings Monday. You didn’t have to be Perry Mason to see that Chairman LarryLeake and the Board were carefully crafting a web designed to catch formerGovernor Mike Easley. The board has obviously done its research and is wellprepared.
Some have wondered why the testimony of Lanny Wilson, NickGarrett and McQueen Campbell didn’t venture into the Mary Easley hiring, Easley’sreal estate investment at Canonsgate, the renovation of the Easley home inSouthport, the marina lease at
The mission of these hearings is to determine if Easley andhis campaign violated state laws regarding the collection and reporting of campaigncash and expenditures. The State Board isn’t through. Perhaps the bigbombshells have exploded, but there’s more to come before Easley himself iscalled to testify. This will be the
The State Board already has, to many minds, enough testimonyto recommend the case to Wake District Attorney Colon Willoughby forprosecution. Easley’s testimony will be on the record and can be used in thataction.
Irrespective of any other outcome from these hearings theone overwhelming conclusion that must be reached is the screaming need for furtherreform in our election laws. We must change laws that allow candidates, PACs orcorporations from contributing large amounts to political parties that can thenbe funneled as in-kind contributions to individual candidates. The current lawprohibits this practice but everyone knows it happens and merely winks at it.
Republicans should be glad their behind-the-scenes effortsto remove chairman Leake from presiding at the hearings were not successful.Leake isn’t pulling any punches in his administration of the hearings, removingany prospective charges of political favoritism.
We were amused at Tuesday’s News and Observer columnbemoaning Easley’s metamorphosis from a hard-charging, crime busting DA andAttorney General to just another politician on the take. We’ve been toSouthport, we’ve talked to people who live there, as well as to many others whohave had contact with Mike Easley throughout his career, both at the coast andin

The problem I have with this process is that Gov Easleys crimes have been known for years....why is Chairman Leake not on trial with him for ignoring these issues when first reported? The Carolina Journal reported on this in a lot of detail and now this is "an investigation" after the damage by his administration has been inflicted on the good Citizens of NC. These charges are serious and they were just as serious when first reported....shame on SBOE, the Feds and the rest of the media! You're all hypocrites!
Reply to this
If it's true that Mike Easley has always been a sleazeball, then that just doubles my desire to see him have to answer to these charges. And I hope that both "Bonnie and Clyde" Easley go to jail.
But, my biggest desire is that the people of this state will see the value in learning more about candidates running for elective office rather than just voting blindly for a party label.
Reply to this